Sid Meier's Civilization VII

seems very rushed for cash grab. Lose interest fast. Difficult to keep track on buildings and upgrades. The Fonts are boring— the amenities are difficult to allot. A lot of work needs to be done here. Tragic.

Game is awesome! Combat is improved with the generals and diplomacy & religion are better. Was too easy to dominate 6 with religion. And resources are way better you can't simply win because you got the only iron or oil now resources give buffs so the cheap tactic of blocking resources isn't a thing made it too easy to win in 6 as well

I appreciate the new cities and towns dynamic as well as the Commanders that stack troops.

But the Era's system and not being able to get veteran leveled up troops break the gane.

The strict rails you put on achievements for each age are tiresome and destroy the one more turn cravings.

Absolutely hate the ages system, Civ switching and the choice of “leaders” they came out with. Complete bastardization of the franchise. Do not want to play Humankind. How on earth did they think this was a good idea?

At launch I would have rated a 1 but if you give it time and you think about what they game is trying to accomplish, it's actually pretty cool. Yes, it's very rough. Day one it had more bugs than features and sure it's a cash grab - I hate that term. Games are produced by people who are looking to make money and not for our inane amusement. Ideally, the publishers can accomplish both and I'm confident that this franchise will do a great job iterating its way continuously towards an awesome experience (and money).

Civilization games have a history of being a little slow out of the blocks, but Civ 7 feels particularly sluggish. There’s a distinct lack of polish and a lot of crashes on console at launch, not to mention a bunch of missing features, Civs, and Leaders that really should have been there right from the get-go. My biggest gripe with the game lies elsewhere though.

One of the things that I love most about Civilization games is building an empire that can survive and thrive through the ages. However, being forced to switch Civs at each age transition cheapens that somewhat. It feels like change for the sake of change, and I can’t for the life of me understand why it wasn’t made optional. As things stand, I’d much rather be playing Civ 6, and looking at Steam DB, I’m far from the only one.

Very disappointed. I am a long time player of the series, and I feel let down. I am not excited to play the game, but force myself to play and see what I am missing. And each time, I find a new reason to turn the game off. I haven’t yet, but may just play the older games. If the game never releases a new one, this last one will have ruined its legacy.

Afrer they add missing 4th age and repair all bugs IT Will be maybe worth of Francise name.