Cee

Yet another article about "Jeanne d'Arc", a twenty-something -year-old game that distorts history beyond recognition, and not just in terms of the monsters. This review says that it depicts Joan of Arc receiving "powers from the gods" (plural), whereas she repeatedly said she received a mission from the Christian God; and it also shows her personally fighting in combat whereas both she and the numerous eyewitness accounts described her as a non-combatant who carried her banner rather than using weapons.

Re: "Jeanne d'Arc': even aside from the inclusion of monsters etc, the mundane elements are also erroneous on many points (Joan of Arc didn't personally fight in combat, the maps are all wrong, the basic outline of her battles is wrong, etc).

Re: "Jeanne d'Arc': even aside from the inclusion of monsters etc, the mundane elements are also erroneous on many points (Joan of Arc didn't personally fight in combat, the maps are all wrong, the basic outline of her battles is wrong, etc).

Re::"Jeanne d'Arc": even aside from the monsters included in the game, the mundane elements are also erroneous on many points (Joan of Arc didn't personally fight in combat, the maps are all wrong, the basic outline of her battles is wrong, etc). 

Re: "Jeanne d'Arc": even aside from the inclusion of monsters in the game; the mundane elements are erroneous on many points as well since Joan of Arc didn't personally fight in combat, the maps are all wrong, the basic outline of her battles are wrong, etc.

 One of the games this article recommends as a "living history book" is "Bladestorm: Nightmare" which has dragons and goblins. The article mentions Joan of Arc, but the game's version of her bears little resemblance to the historical person.