Kvetchy_Kvaddle

It's more than a bit disingenuous to describe the criticism against aspects of the game as anti-"woke". While there may have been some who felt that way, the major criticism was against the didactic nature of some aspects of the game. It wasn't about the presence of LGBT+ characters; it was about being lectured to. Nobody likes being lectured to, and it's not how good storytelling works. There are plenty of books, movies, and games that have story/thematic elements that could be described as "woke". The good ones present those themes as organic aspects of their stories; the bad ones do it inorganically by lecturing.

What you’re missing is you seem to be mixing up the monthly games, which if added during the month in which they’re

available remain in your library as long as you remain a subscriber, and the PS+ library games, which get rotated in and out on an irregular basis and to which subscribers lose access when they are rotated out, regardless of whether subscribers have added them to their personal library or not. This article is about PS+ library games leaving the service, not monthly games.

While the price for most Nintendo 64 cartridges was, in fact $60, the standard price for games for all the other major consoles in 1999 was $50.

The $10 price premium for the Nintendo games was presumably due to the fact that that Nintendo’s console used cartridges, whereas the other consoles (PlayStation, DreamCast, etc.) Used CD-ROMs.

"How do you feel about certain Nintendo Switch 2 games being $80?"

I'm quite happy that the price of Switch 2 games will be $80. In fact, I would be even happier if the price were even higher.

Seriously, what kind of question is that? "Do you like high prices?" Come on, TheBestWarGames writers, you can do better than that.