miguel angel

I don't think palworld fans are toxic. But on the other hand pokemon fans made up claims about how palworld monsters were pokemon copies, they even went to the extra mille to fake the proof. Bring up "what do you prefer: pokemon or palworld" in a pokemon group and not only you'll get 90% pokemon and a lot of hate, you'll be banned from the group (I talk from experience) where if you do the same in a palworld group you'll get a 60-40% towards palworld and a dozen or so comprehensive comments explaining the virtues of both games...

...? What? What are you talking about? You don't need to pay for anything to prove that the different mechanics already exists. One of the aspects that Nintendo is suing palworld for is to be able to ride a mount that has been tamed somehow. That's literally the patent and that's also literally what you do on ark... On the other hand "prior art" means that something existed before you went and patented it, proving it that you haven't invented it and that you have no right to hold a patent. This can be done even with free stuff... Because copyright laws allows you to copy mechanics from free mods.

There are a fes reasons behind this. Of course Nintendo wants to destroy palworld, but they are not suin the other companies because they don't want to. Having a patent doesn't force you to sue everyone that infringes It, It only allows you have the biggest advantage of you decide to sue someone. I still think that Nintendo is being worse than the Devil here, trying to get as big of a monopoly as possible and I allways thought they would have paid and/or bribed the japanese patent administration somewhat to allow them to patent things that clearly have been public for a bunch of years. Pokemon has also a capturing chance % system that has never been patented (every single ball has a different catch rate % and this has existed since the very begining, even more when all the new balls were introduced) so for me they can go back to hell